Drobe :: The archives
About Drobe | Contact | RSS | Twitter | Webspace | Tech docs | Downloads | BBC Micro

Profile for JWCR

ContactAbout me
Username: JWCR
Realname: John Rees
About me:
Homepage: http://www.gardd-lelog.org.uk
Comments posted:110 (show all)

Recent comments

On Internet Explorer spotted running on a RISC OS:

Aren't you 28 days early?

 is a RISC OS UserJWCR on 4/3/07 1:02AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On South West show reports and photos:

thegman: There is little point in one of the major players commisioning a new logo for RISC OS, if the others chose not to use it. Any rebranding would require a degree of co-ordination and cooperation between ROL, ROOL and Castle.

 is a RISC OS UserJWCR on 28/2/07 1:51AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On How to port RISC OS 5 to the RiscPC:

thegman wrote: "It is one thing to convince a hobbyist to shell out maybe £100 on a RiscPC so he can play around with RO5, and maybe contribute some useful code, it is another to get him to shell out £800 on an Iyonix."

Which opens up the age old question of - Why is modern entry level RISC OS equipment so expensive? At £500 even an A9Home is too expensive. The platform needs something equivalent to a £250-£300 machine with a degree of upgrade-ability that will get hobbists interested in our favourite operating system. As their interest develops, then they will move on to higher specced more expensive machines.

 is a RISC OS UserJWCR on 31/01/07 11:08PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On Thunderbird 'demo' port released:

I hope that this was a neccessary excercise that aids in the completion of Firefox for RISC OS. Otherwise this is a bit of a distraction. Firefox 2 for RISC OS is barely functional, vital things like the hotlist and downloading do not work on my copy, there is no point in having RISC OS style menus if none of the important options work.

 is a RISC OS UserJWCR on 31/1/07 10:25PM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

On How to port RISC OS 5 to the RiscPC:

Even though I still use a RiscPC as a second computer, I am quite happy to keep it running ROS4. I honestly do not see the need for a version of ROS5 that runs on it. It would be better if the people who are going to take advantage of the shared source intiative devote their programming and engineering skills to moving the OS forward. Multicore processors appear to me to be the way silicon technology is moving, with the appearance of a dual-core XScale from Intel last year, wouldn't it be better if attention was focused on making RISC OS use similar and no doubt faster chips that will appear in the future.

 is a RISC OS UserJWCR on 30/1/07 9:45AM
[ Reply | Permalink | Report ]

Search the archives

Today's featured article

  • ChoX11 and Porting
    Bring it to RISC OS
     17 comments, latest by chod on 15/6/04 11:45PM. Published: 14 Jun 2004

  • Random article

  • Iconv utility updated to version 0.08
    Bug fixes and updates, NS users told to upgrade
     Discuss this. Published: 13 Mar 2007

  • Useful links

    News and media:

    Top developers:
    RISCOS LtdRISC OS OpenMW SoftwareR-CompAdvantage SixVirtualAcorn

    CJE MicrosAPDLCastlea4X-AmpleLiquid SiliconWebmonster


    RISCOS.org.ukRISCOS.orgRISCOS.infoFilebaseChris Why's Acorn/RISC OS collectionNetSurf

    Non-RISC OS:
    The RegisterThe InquirerApple InsiderBBC NewsSky NewsGoogle Newsxkcddiodesign

    © 1999-2009 The Drobe Team. Some rights reserved, click here for more information
    Powered by MiniDrobeCMS, based on J4U | Statistics
    "RISC OS development is a waste of time with [Drobe's] aggressive attitude towards reporting and disregard of facts"
    Page generated in 0.072 seconds.